User talk:Tlroche

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Fixing a typo is very useful and reveals a certain conscientiousness, but can we expect more?

Gareth Hughes 00:52, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Tlroche! I noticed that in several recent edits you have shortened lead sections to a single sentence with the motivation break long first section. From this I got the impression you are not aware of the concept "lead section" and the Wikipedia policy regarding it. Therefore I would ask you to read Wikipedia:Lead section. Hopefully this will explain why your edits, though no doubt made in good faith and defendable in some other encyclopedic system, are at odds with standard Wikipedia practice.

Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to the Liquidity Trap article - nice job!

Nice job on the liquidity trap article. Would you care to help out with the recession article? I added a couple of paragraphs but it could use an expert touch. Thanks.Farcaster (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif

Thanks for uploading File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commend

I would like to commend you on your work of the article Endgame Systems and making it less of an advert. Brofist? Phearson (talk) 03:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ayotzinapa

Hello, thank you for your interest in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping. I noticed that you added references from the reports that suggest that the Mexican Federal Police and the Army were involved in the incident. I moved your information to an appropriate section within the article, however, because it did not belong in the introduction. The reports of the Mexican Federal Police and the Army being involved in the mass abduction is still a minority viewpoint. Proceso and the University of California at Berkeley were the ones that did the investigation, but it is not part of the mainstream viewpoint of what really happened. If this perspective is included, than the government's response to the investigation should be included too. Just thought I should let you know. Thanks and happy editing. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 18:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, as of 23 Jan 2016, my information is back in the introduction, with 12 cites! It seems to have become a "mainstream viewpoint" :-) Tlroche (talk) 03:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tlroche. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 21:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Tsett listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsett. Since you created the Tsett redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion. Gorobay (talk) 13:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tlroche. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GeneratingArakawaEGridFromArakawaAGrid.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"EPOP" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect EPOP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16 § EPOP until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XUnit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XUnit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XUnit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--WikiLinuz (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]