Talk:Morbid Angel

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morbid Angel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Abominations of Desolation was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 19 June 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Morbid Angel. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal

Untitled

I'll make the appropriate changes re: Steve Tucker leaving and Jared Anderson joining when I can get some concrete date (year) on when that happened. Or, someone else can if they know.

--Thedangerouskitchen 09:31, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Ignominious is in fact, not real. It's origin came to existence when it was posted as a torrent on a board, and was listed as 80 minutes. CDs cannot last 80 minutes. Also, the release has not been officialized by either Earache or Morbid Angel themselves.

Thank you! I found it suspicious not being cited in their official site nor in the label's page. I should have noticed the weird title!!--Richard George 13:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WTF!!??

Why all of a sudden is the pages to like half the morbid angel albums dissappeared? Can someone fix this please? Okram 09 (talk) 06:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Album sales

Where did someone get their album sales from? Theres no way they have sold near 3 million records in the US.

I agreen that that info seems highly suspect. I believe Deicide and Cannibal Corpse have outsold Morbid Angel and I don't think either of them have sold more then 3 million

It doesn't say "in the U.s.", those are worldwide sales figures. That said, yeah, there's no way they've sold that many.

OK those figures are PATENTLY FALSE source: [1]. It's still kind of interesting that Covenant is the bestseliign death metal album though.

That is just in the US. Its not probable but still possible they have sales around three mill. But it is more then likely their sales are at least in the millions worldwide. Especially given the fact that Altar of madness was released before soundscan and that soundscan generally does not cover independant stores (ie metal/death metal specialty shops). -matt

Erik Rutan?

this article says Erik Rutan left Morbid Angel in 2003, yet he played guitar for Morbid Angel at the Wacken Open Air festival 2006, on the 5th August 2006.... thus suggesting he has rejoined Morbid Angel. Morbid Angel is awesome!!!

        He's temporarily filling in for them on some live dates.  I don't think he's rejoined the band, at least not officially [2]

ah, jobs a good'un, thanks for clearing that up.

Ignominious DO NOT ADD it is an internet bootleg

This is not an actual Morbid Angel release and has been posted on the internet on a Bit Torrent site with cover art to make it seem real but it is fake. Do NOT add it to the page. Thank you

AtTheGatesOfBodom 19:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MorbidAngel Heretic.jpg

Image:MorbidAngel Heretic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MorbidAngel EntangledinChaos.jpg

Image:MorbidAngel EntangledinChaos.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Morbid Angel GatewaysToAnnihilation.jpg

Image:Morbid Angel GatewaysToAnnihilation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Morbidangel domination.jpg

Image:Morbidangel domination.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blackened Death Metal

I have heard talk about Abominations of Desolation being blackened death metal i have listened to most of the album (as recorded on later albums) but never actually listened to Abominations now to the hard part would that album be classified as blackened death metal or just death metal

--65.122.47.164 (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Look into the blacken ed death metal talk page. it is scheduled for deletion, which is why the category for this article should be for Death metal instead. ~~VS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Venus Satanas (talk • contribs) 20:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 8th studio album

Any actual sources on this? I haven't found any info on their website, nor anywhere else for that matter. And there's always been gossip. 212.76.37.160 (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Someone obviously didn't actually look at the website. In the site's biography section "The new album is in the works and a new song is being played live on this tour - "Nevermore"."71.232.93.148 (talk) 21:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthen the biography

No offence to the person who wrote this but it really didn't tell me much about them when I first read it. More information regarding their albums in the biography would be nice.71.177.12.165 (talk) 01:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I moved all the content over from Abominations of Desolation someone may want to refine it or trim it, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Morbid Angel/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs more references, in-line citations before I would rate higher. --Bookworm857158367 12:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:25, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Errors

(Wiki) - In an interview in December 2013, David Vincent confirmed that Pete Sandoval is no longer a member of the band, claiming that Sandoval had "found Jesus", and stating, "Pete Sandoval and Morbid Angel are not compatible", laying to rest speculation that Sandoval would eventually be returning to the band.

JM - Not true, Pete left the band because of severe spinal pain from his already damaged spine from extreme drumming and had to use “triggers” like most drummers nowadays.

(Wiki) - On June 19, 2015, David Vincent confirmed that he left Morbid Angel, due to creative differences.[19]

 JM – Again, not true, there had always been a conflict between Trey and David about where the band was going and NOT “creative differences”.

^[1]

References

^ Relative of Trey

Trey Azagthoth

Is "being not notable outside of the band" a valid reason for deleting an article? The article was not moved to the band's article as a section. So, is there a valid reason for redirection (and deletion) you can give? The article was "long" enough not to be considered unimportant so redirecting the page while deleting all its components doesn't seem logical. Is being not notable outside of the band among the rules of wikipedia and a reason to completely delete an article about the artist himself? - Avatar ⁹ⁿ 09:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherited. Just because someone plays in a notable band does not make that person notable. What makes someone or something notable is how much independent reliable sources talk about that someone or something.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would notability be recognized if a bunch of citations proving his 'notableness' were provided? Ie: a bunch of magazine articles declaring him one of the finest guitarists on the planet? But 'being not notable outside of the band' is a slippery slope. Charlie Watts has a wikipedia page - is he notable outside of being a member of the Rolling Stones? Heck, is Kirk Hammet notable outside of being a member of Metallica? Could go on and on listing examples.Robbmonster (talk) 07:08, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morbid Angel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130905122448/http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/guitar-world-s-100-greatest-heavy-metal-guitarists-of-all-time/ to http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/guitar-world-s-100-greatest-heavy-metal-guitarists-of-all-time/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morbid Angel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110827092939/http://www.morbidangel.com/lavareport1.html to http://www.morbidangel.com/lavareport1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Morbid Angel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Relative of Trey

[1]