Talk:Seven deadly sins

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seven deadly sins article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 12 months

Philosophy: Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Christianity Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 18 September 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the section, 'Historical Sins: Acedia', insert citation after, "To him, it was the "middle sin", the only one characterised by an absence or insufficiency of love." Citation: McCarron, Bill and Knoke, Paul (2002) "From Gent to Gentil: Jed Tewksbury and the Function of Literary Allusion in A Place to Come To," *Robert Penn Warren Studies*: Vol. 2 , Article 6. Muriosity (talk) 20:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Formatting changed a slight bit to match Wikipedia's CS1/CS2 format as the template does it. Aidan9382 _(talk) 16:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Arrogance instead of Pride 109.242.137.212 (talk) 11:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed-up Sources

When navigating to the source of Dorothy L. Sayer's thoughts on wrath, the source number of 37 is that of (Landau, Ronnie (30 October 2010). The Seven deadly Sins: A companion. ISBN 978-1-4457-3227-5.) The true source of Sayer's quote is from the source number of 22, which is placed just under the heading of Historical Views here. Armadyx (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Islam

Who on Earth thought it was at all helpful to muddy the waters of an already muddy pool by introducing a corresponding list of deadly sins in Islam? Catholicism was muddying its own pool quite well enough by itself, thanks. At the very least, that person ought to have linked shirk to the Wiki article Shirk (Islam); ever-forgetful that there already is an English verb to shirk. As it adds nothing but confusion to the article (which apart from this deals exclusively with moral science from a Judaeo-Christian perspective), I'm partial to the notion of deleting the reference entirely; however, I'll withhold my damp sponge from the blackboard to see what others may think of it. Nuttyskin (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Moving pictures"

In the introduction section, it says the concept of the Seven Deadly Sins has found its way "into the streams of religious and philosophical thought, fine art painting, and popular culture, including literature and new forms of media such as moving pictures and digital streaming." Is "moving pictures" really necessary here? Perhaps I'm unfamiliar with the Wikipedia style guide for such topics, but that seems unnatural, convoluted, and pretentious. It also compromises the reader's ability to quickly digest and comprehend this information in the way that an introduction section should for an article. Jtwooz (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]