This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Well, may be i should just check how many comment are unsigned and leave it to bot. I think the manual checking has cause nuisance and edit conflict. Matthew hk (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Matthew hk has tied in some disruptive edits in his manual archiving exercise[1] by moving around some comments to the wrong locations, e.g., a response to the case of the Cook Islands to that of Sealand. Don't think any reasonable editor who's actually read could have committed such errors and it's difficult to assume that he acted in good faith. I have partially reverted his edits by relocating some of the {{Archivebottom}} tags he's added. I hope some "experienced" editors may remind him that he gotta be prudent, careful and responsible. 220.246.55.231 (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
i saw that the State of Palestine's security forces lack of a standing military force and have limited military,can it enter on this list? Kalininos (talk) 00:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a bit of a different situation, with the lack of a standing military force existing in the context of occupation and a lack of effective statehood. There might be sources discussing this explicitly in the context of the Oslo Accords, but I can't find something at a quick glance. CMD (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]